Is A Trump Win Guaranteed If Biden Drops Out?

By

Hunter Uses Trump Ruling to Seek Dismissal of Cases

On Thursday, Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, took significant legal steps to dismiss his criminal conviction on gun charges and to throw out a separate case accusing him of tax evasion. His legal argument centers on the claim that the special counsel prosecuting him, David Weiss, was unlawfully appointed.

Biden’s legal team cited a pivotal federal judge’s ruling earlier in the week that dismissed a criminal case against former President Donald Trump. This case had accused Trump of illegally retaining classified documents after leaving office. On Monday, Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon found that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith in Trump’s case violated the U.S. Constitution because Congress had not explicitly authorized him to pursue the case.

This ruling by Judge Cannon has given Biden’s lawyers a foundational argument for their motion. They assert that similar legal principles should apply to the appointment of David Weiss, who recently secured Hunter Biden’s conviction in Delaware federal court. Hunter Biden was convicted on charges of lying about his illegal drug use when purchasing a gun.

Furthermore, David Weiss is also leading a separate tax evasion case against Hunter Biden. This case, which alleges that Biden failed to pay taxes on substantial income, is scheduled to go to trial in September. The defense argues that if Weiss’s appointment is found to be unconstitutional, as Smith’s was in Trump’s case, then both the gun conviction and the tax case should be dismissed.

The developments in Hunter Biden’s legal battles come amid a highly charged political atmosphere. The implications of these cases extend beyond the individuals directly involved, touching on broader questions about the appointment and authority of special counsels and the constitutional limits of their powers. Hunter Biden’s legal team is leveraging recent judicial decisions to challenge the legitimacy of the prosecutions against him, aiming to overturn his conviction and dismiss the pending tax case.

As these legal maneuvers unfold, they are likely to draw significant public and media attention, given the high-profile nature of the individuals involved and the precedent-setting potential of the rulings. The outcome of these legal challenges could have lasting impacts on the interpretation of special counsel appointments and the conduct of future prosecutions involving high-ranking public figures.