Is Liz Cheney Wrong To Call Trump A ‘Misogynist Pig’?

Trump ‘Too Conservative’?

A recent poll conducted by The New York Times and Siena College, which surveyed 1,695 registered voters nationwide from September 3-6, has provided insights into the political perceptions of presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The findings indicate a slight edge for Trump, who leads Harris 48% to 47% in voter preference.

The poll delved deeper into voter perceptions of each candidate’s political alignment. It revealed that 32% of voters consider Trump to be “too conservative,” while 11% think he is “not conservative enough.” A majority of 50% believe his political stance is “not too far either way,” demonstrating a balance in his appeal. On the other hand, only 8% of respondents were undecided or chose not to answer regarding Trump’s political orientation.

Comparatively, Kamala Harris is viewed by 44% of voters as “too liberal or progressive,” which is significantly higher than the percentage viewing Trump as overly conservative. Only 9% of voters feel Harris is “not liberal or progressive enough,” while 42% see her as holding a moderate stance, similar to the proportion for Trump. However, her position garners slightly more concern about being overly progressive than Trump’s does about being overly conservative. Additionally, 5% of voters were undecided or did not respond to questions about Harris’s political leanings.

The poll also explored voter familiarity and comfort with the candidates, revealing that 28% of voters feel they need more information about Harris to support her fully. This contrasts with only 9% feeling similarly about Trump, suggesting a disparity in public familiarity and comfort levels with the candidates.

The survey, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points among likely voters, suggests that while Trump has a marginal lead, both candidates face challenges in swaying the electorate due to their perceived political stances. This dynamic underscores the complexity of voter attitudes and the nuanced perspectives that can influence electoral outcomes.